Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Tabur vs Maxime Chazal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tabur vs Chazal analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Tabur vs Maxime Chazal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tabur 2 - 0 Chazal
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tabur has won 47.52% of points on their second serve, while Chazal has won 46.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tabur, in recent form, has won 51.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chazal has won 52.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.84% and 35.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tabur has saved 60.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chazal has saved 62.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tabur has won 65.82% of matches played (W/L 52/ 27), with Chazal winning 56.86% (W/L 29/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34). Chazal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 412/ 242), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Tabur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 81.4% of matches (W/L 35/ 8), where as Chazal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.57% of matches (W/L 25/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tabur winning 2 times and Chazal being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tabur winning 4 and Chazal winning 1. The last match between Tabur and Chazal was at the M25 Angers, 23-04-2023, Final, Clay with Clement Tabur getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tabur and Chazal have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tabur winning 1 times and Chazal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tabur winning 0, and Chazal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tabur has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.2 while Chazal has played against players with an average rank of 211.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tabur has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chazal has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tabur has converted 35.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chazal has converted 46.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
234
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
561
Rank
234
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
61% (241-156)
Career Total W/L
60% (448-293)
48% (13-14)
YTD W/L
58% (14-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,860
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Clement Tabur | Maxime Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 30 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:30:0 | 2:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (99/159) | 56% (112/199) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (69/99) | 60% (67/112) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (30/60) | 45% (39/87) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 39% (11/28) | 37% (7/19) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (93/199) | 38% (60/159) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Clement Tabur
Player
Maxime Chazal
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
53%
(
63 of
119)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Tabur | Maxime Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (13/14) | 58% (14/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (28/31) | 58% (32/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (284/277) | 52% (275/253) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) | 67% (14/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 99 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:58 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.59 | 163.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1127/1832) | 63% (1099/1735) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (752/1127) | 69% (755/1099) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (335/705) | 46% (294/636) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (78/217) | 47% (78/167) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (773/1860) | 41% (683/1649) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/4) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 74% (14/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 61% (14/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 25% (8/2) |
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Clement Tabur
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Marco Cecchinato
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Clement Tabur
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Theo Papamalamis
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Arthur Reymond
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Simon Beaupain
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
76 of
110)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Maxime Chazal
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Jasza Szajrych
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Noah Perfetti
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Neil Oberleitner
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tabur Vs Chazal Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Maxime Chazal
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
